Thanks in part to the green movement, energy efficiency has gone from being mostly associated with pollution reduction to also being known for its dramatic ability to reduce annual utility cost, making it a cost cutting measure that many companies now prefer to layoffs, cancellation of services, and outsourcing. But if you hope to achieve the biggest savings at the least cost, you shouldn’t just replace your building’s current technology with more efficient technology. You should target your building’s biggest problem areas first, hiring an energy consultant to perform an energy audit of your entire building. With the results in hand, the consultant can target solutions that most reduce your energy expense and meet additional project goals.

Energy Efficient Lighting Design is a Top Concern for Most Buildings

Because lighting technology tends to last for decades, many buildings are stuck in the past concerning lighting efficiency. Consequently, energy efficient lighting design is one of the most recommended efficiency measures for commercial buildings, especially considering interior lighting accounts for roughly 60% of a commercial building’s annual electrical expense. In most cases, the goal is to reduce annual lighting expense by at least 50%, a percentage that’s easily achievable when companies implement the right efficiency measures, which vary according to a building’s unique needs.

Four Conservation Strategies that Cut Annual Lighting Cost

The most well known measures in energy efficiency lighting projects are the replacement of old fluorescent ballasts with more efficient ballasts, and the replacement of incandescent lamps with compact fluorescent lamps and/or high intensity discharge lamps. But conservation strategies can be just as important to reducing lighting expense as implementing efficient technology. Three conservation strategies that often attend the implementation of efficient lighting are as follows:

1. Improved Light Control

After implementing efficient lighting, many companies need help controlling its use. For example, a single switch might control multiple lights, and general lighting probably remains lit until someone turns it off, regardless or workspace occupancy or time of day. In response to these problems, light switches can be rewired to let switches control less lights, and general illumination can be connected to automatic controls that regulate light levels according to movement, work schedules, the presence of natural light, time of day, etc.

2. De-lamping

De-lamping involves the removing of unnecessary lamps, which can be many considering that efficient lighting often raises interior light levels by 30%. When de-lamping, all lamps are considered for possible removal, from exterior floodlights to small nightlights and lights within vending machines.

3. Improved Light Settings

Sometimes enhancing the presence of existing illumination solves the need for more lamps. To provide more lighting without implementing more lamps, energy consultants often recommend implementing special lenses to light fixtures to focus light, implementing reflectors that spread light, and painting walls a lighter color.

View the original article here

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Related Posts:

 

If you own a commercial building whose lighting hasn’t been upgraded in years, chances are you’re significantly overpaying to light your building. Interior lighting alone accounts for roughly 60% of a commercial building’s energy use, and exterior lighting can significantly add to that percentage, depending on your building’s size and exterior illumination needs. Reducing your annual lighting expense begins with having an energy efficiency consultant perform a lighting audit of your entire building, the information from which will be used to target approaches that meet your building’s individual needs, as well your goals for your project.

Six Approaches to Energy Efficient Lighting for Commercial Buildings

To reduce a building’s lighting expense, an efficiency consult often proposes numerous approaches to efficiency. The following six approaches are commonly suggested for various types of buildings.

1. Replacing Old Fluorescent Ballasts

Typically located in halls, corridors, and other central areas, old fluorescent ballasts don’t accommodate today’s most efficient fluorescent bulbs, using more energy than necessary to produce the optimal effect. As a result, they’re often replaced with more efficient ballasts, such as those that accommodate T8 lamps instead of T12 lamps.

2. Replacing Incandescent Lighting

Typically found in offices, work areas, and other small spaces, incandescent lamps are the least efficient lamps on the market. Two common strategies for removing it are replacing it with compact fluorescent lamps and replacing it with high intensity discharge lamps.

3. Improving Light Settings

To improve light settings, efficiency consultants can recommend a range of strategies, including: lowering light fixtures, applying lenses to fixtures to offer more concentrated illumination, applying reflectors to fixtures to spread light, and applying light colored paint to walls, all of which could reduce the need for extra lamps.

4. De-lamping

De-lamping consists of removing unnecessary lamps to the extent that newer, more efficient lighting makes it unnecessary. De-lamping can occur on building’s interior and exterior, and can consist of removing everything from floodlights to lamps in vending machines.

5. Better Lighting Control

Having efficient lighting technology will save you lots of money. But you can save even more by conserving its use as much as possible. Two common measures for conserving lamp use are rewiring light switches to where a single switch doesn’t control numerous lamps, and implementing light control systems, which regulate light levels according to numerous criteria, such work schedules, time of day, presence of natural light, and/or physical movement.

6. Replacing Old Exit Signs

If your building has incandescent exit signs, it has the worst type exit signs in terms of energy efficiency and cost of maintenance. Four types of exit signs that are less expensive than incandescent signs are: compact fluorescent signs, LED signs, Tritium signs, and photoluminescent signs, with research showing that companies that replace 100 incandescent signs with 100 photoluminescent signs can save roughly $3,700 annually in energy costs alone.?

View the original article here

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Related Posts:

© 2012 Solar & Wind Power Solutions Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha